ArticleDigital health
Research and application of tongue and face diagnosis based on deep learning.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The association between tongue features and tongue coating microbiota and gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Review
- Computerized tongue image analysis for non-invasive disease screening: a review.Chinese medicine · 2025Review
- Evaluating deep learning techniques for identifying tongue features in subthreshold depression: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Opportunities and challenges of traditional Chinese medicine doctors in the era of artificial intelligence.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the technical research and application characteristics of deep learning in tongue-facial diagnosis. Methods: Through summarizing the merits and demerits of current image processing techniques used in the traditional medical tongue and face diagnosis, the research status of deep learning in tongue image preprocessing, segmentation, and classification was analyzed and reviewed, and the algorithm was compared and verified with the real tongue and face image. Images of the face and tongue used for diagnosis in conventional medicine were systematically reviewed, from acquisition and pre-processing to segmentation, classification, algorithm comparison, result from analysis, and application. Results: Deep learning improved the speed and accuracy of tongue and face diagnostic image data processing. Among them, the average intersection ratio of U-net and Seg-net models exceeded 0.98, and the segmentation speed ranged from 54 to 58 ms. Conclusion: There is no unified standard for lingual-facial diagnosis objectification in terms of image acquisition conditions and image processing methods, thus further research is indispensable. It is feasible to use the images acquired by mobile in the field of medical image analysis by reducing the influence of environmental and other factors on the quality of lingual-facial diagnosis images and improving the efficiency of image processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.