ArticleDermatology practical & conceptual2022
Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy and Therapeutic Approach of Dermatologists and Plastic Surgeons To Non-Melanocytic Skin Lesions By Using Telemedicine.
Article in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of teledermatology for skin diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Challenges in Teledermoscopy Diagnostic Outcome Studies: Scoping Review of Heterogeneous Study Characteristics.JMIR dermatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the new circumstances of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, tele-dermatology and tele-dermoscopy have become more important in daily practice for departments for which visuality is at the forefront as dermatology and plastic and reconstructive surgery. Objectives: This study was aimed to determine diagnostic accuracy and treatment approaches of non-melanocytic skin lesions between 2 clinics by store and forward tele-dermatology method and to evaluate the contribution of tele-dermoscopy to the diagnostic accuracy for dermatologists. Methods: A total of 26 patients with non-melanocytic skin lesions were included in the study. Clinical images of the lesions were sent by email to 3 plastic surgeons and 3 dermatologists. The accuracy of the diagnoses was evaluated by comparing tele-dermatology with histopathology. Diagnosis and treatment approaches were recorded for both clinics. Dermatologists also defined their diagnosis with tele-dermoscopic images. Results: The mean percentage of diagnostic accuracy among dermatologists was 74.3% and among plastic surgeons was 61.5%. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between departments (P = 0.625). There was a statistically significant difference between the departments for diagnostic and treatment approaches (P values respectively P = 0.002, P < 0.001). Plastic surgeons preferred to confirm their pre-diagnosis histopathologically more than dermatologists. Plastic surgeons recommended surgical procedures for 25 lesions (96.2%) while dermatologists for 14 (53.8%) ones. Tele-dermoscopy increased the rate of diagnostic accuracy of dermatologists from 74.3% to 82.0% (P = 0.02). Conclusions: Tele-dermatology is an effective method for non-melanocytic skin lesions with high diagnostic accuracy. Adding dermoscopy to tele-dermatology increases diagnostic accuracy of dermatologists on non-melanocytic skin lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.