Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36158815›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Predicting acute kidney injury risk in acute myocardial infarction patients: An artificial intelligence model using medical information mart for intensive care databases.

Dabei Cai, Tingting Xiao, Ailin Zou, Lipeng Mao, Boyu Chi, Yu Wang, Qingjie Wang, Yuan Ji, Ling Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Artificial intelligence and acute kidney injury].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dabei CaiDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Tingting XiaoDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Ailin ZouDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Lipeng MaoDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Boyu ChiDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Yu WangDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Qingjie WangDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Yuan JiDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Ling SunDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Predictive models based on machine learning have been widely used in clinical practice. Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are prone to the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), which results in a poor prognosis for the patient. The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning predictive model for the identification of AKI in AMI patients. Methods: Patients with AMI who had been registered in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) III and IV database were enrolled. The primary outcome was the occurrence of AKI during hospitalization. We developed Random Forests (RF) model, Naive Bayes (NB) model, Support Vector Machine (SVM) model, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (xGBoost) model, Decision Trees (DT) model, and Logistic Regression (LR) models with AMI patients in MIMIC-IV database. The importance ranking of all variables was obtained by the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method. AMI patients in MIMIC-III databases were used for model evaluation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to compare the performance of each model. Results: A total of 3,882 subjects with AMI were enrolled through screening of the MIMIC database, of which 1,098 patients (28.2%) developed AKI. We randomly assigned 70% of the patients in the MIMIC-IV data to the training cohort, which is used to develop models in the training cohort. The remaining 30% is allocated to the testing cohort. Meanwhile, MIMIC-III patient data performs the external validation function of the model. 3,882 patients and 37 predictors were included in the analysis for model construction. The top 5 predictors were serum creatinine, activated partial prothrombin time, blood glucose concentration, platelets, and atrial fibrillation, (SHAP values are 0.670, 0.444, 0.398, 0.389, and 0.381, respectively). In the testing cohort, using top 20 important features, the models of RF, NB, SVM, xGBoost, DT model, and LR obtained AUC of 0.733, 0.739, 0.687, 0.689, 0.663, and 0.677, respectively. Placing RF models of number of different variables on the external validation cohort yielded their AUC of 0.711, 0.754, 0.778, 0.781, and 0.777, respectively. Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms, particularly the random forest algorithm, have improved the accuracy of risk stratification for AKI in AMI patients and are applied to accurately identify the risk of AKI in AMI patients.

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryacute myocardia infarctionarea under the receiver operating characteristic curvemachine learningrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID36158815
PMCPMC9489917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.