Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36158811›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Outcomes after right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with valve substitutes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xu Wang, Wouter Bakhuis, Kevin M Veen, Ad J J C Bogers, Jonathan R G Etnel, Carlijn C E M van Der Ven, Jolien W Roos-Hesselink, Eleni-Rosalina Andrinopoulou, Johanna J M Takkenberg

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Pulmonary expanded polytetrafluoroethylene conduits with a hand-sewn tricuspid valve.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xu WangDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Wouter BakhuisDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Kevin M VeenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Ad J J C BogersDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jonathan R G EtnelDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Carlijn C E M van Der VenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jolien W Roos-HesselinkDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Eleni-Rosalina AndrinopoulouDepartment of Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Johanna J M TakkenbergDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to provide an overview of outcomes after right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction using different valve substitutes in different age groups for different indications. Methods: The literature was systematically searched for articles published between January 2000 and June 2021 reporting on clinical and/or echocardiographic outcomes after RVOT reconstruction with valve substitutes. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for outcomes, and time-related outcomes were visualized by pooled Kaplan-Meier curves. Subgroup analyses were performed according to etiology, implanted valve substitute and patient age. Results: Two hundred and seventeen articles were included, comprising 37,078 patients (age: 22.86 ± 11.29 years; 31.6% female) and 240,581 patient-years of follow-up. Aortic valve disease (Ross procedure, 46.6%) and Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF, 27.0%) were the two main underlying etiologies. Homograft and xenograft accounted for 83.7 and 32.6% of the overall valve substitutes, respectively. The early mortality, late mortality, reintervention and endocarditis rates were 3.36% (2.91-3.88), 0.72%/y (95% CI: 0.62-0.82), 2.62%/y (95% CI: 2.28-3.00), and 0.38%/y (95%CI: 0.31-0.47) for all patients. The early mortality for TOF and truncus arteriosus (TA) were 1.95% (1.31-2.90) and 10.67% (7.79-14.61). Pooled late mortality and reintervention rate were 0.59%/y (0.39-0.89), 1.41%/y (0.87-2.27), and 1.20%/y (0.74-1.94), 10.15%/y (7.42-13.90) for TOF and TA, respectively. Endocarditis rate was 0.21%/y (95% CI: 0.16-0.27) for a homograft substitute and 0.80%/y (95%CI: 0.60-1.09) for a xenograft substitute. Reintervention rate for infants, children and adults was 8.80%/y (95% CI: 6.49-11.95), 4.75%/y (95% CI: 3.67-6.14), and 0.72%/y (95% CI: 0.36-1.42), respectively. Conclusion: This study shows RVOT reconstruction with valve substitutes can be performed with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates for most patients. Reinterventions after RVOT reconstruction with valve substitutes are inevitable for most patients in their life-time, emphasizing the necessity of life-long follow-up and multidisciplinary care. Follow-up protocols should be tailored to individual patients because patients with different etiologies, ages, and implanted valve substitutes have different rates of mortality and morbidity. Systematic review registration: [www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero], identifier [CRD42021271622].

Indexed as

homograftright ventricular outflow tract reconstructionross procedureTetralogy of Fallottruncus arteriosusxenograft

Identifiers

PMID36158811
PMCPMC9489846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.