SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Outcomes after right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with valve substitutes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Paediatric aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and microsimulation study.European heart journal · 2023Pooled it
- Cylinder Bicuspid Pulmonary Valve Reconstruction Using Equine Pericardium: A Novel Technique for Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Repair.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Meta-analysis of valved conduits in right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction: comparison of homograft, bovine jugular vein, and EPTFE valved conduits.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Ectopic Calcification in Congenital Heart Surgery: A Material-Centric Review.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Review
- Long-term follow-up of valved homografts in right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery reconstruction: A comprehensive case series.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2025Article
- Perioperative Considerations, Anesthetic Management and Transesophageal Echocardiographic Evaluation of Patients Undergoing the Ross Procedure.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Pulmonary expanded polytetrafluoroethylene conduits with a hand-sewn tricuspid valve.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Heterotopically-placed right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduit does not negatively affect outcomes.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Article
- Pediatric pulmonary valve replacements: Clinical challenges and emerging technologies.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to provide an overview of outcomes after right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction using different valve substitutes in different age groups for different indications. Methods: The literature was systematically searched for articles published between January 2000 and June 2021 reporting on clinical and/or echocardiographic outcomes after RVOT reconstruction with valve substitutes. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for outcomes, and time-related outcomes were visualized by pooled Kaplan-Meier curves. Subgroup analyses were performed according to etiology, implanted valve substitute and patient age. Results: Two hundred and seventeen articles were included, comprising 37,078 patients (age: 22.86 ± 11.29 years; 31.6% female) and 240,581 patient-years of follow-up. Aortic valve disease (Ross procedure, 46.6%) and Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF, 27.0%) were the two main underlying etiologies. Homograft and xenograft accounted for 83.7 and 32.6% of the overall valve substitutes, respectively. The early mortality, late mortality, reintervention and endocarditis rates were 3.36% (2.91-3.88), 0.72%/y (95% CI: 0.62-0.82), 2.62%/y (95% CI: 2.28-3.00), and 0.38%/y (95%CI: 0.31-0.47) for all patients. The early mortality for TOF and truncus arteriosus (TA) were 1.95% (1.31-2.90) and 10.67% (7.79-14.61). Pooled late mortality and reintervention rate were 0.59%/y (0.39-0.89), 1.41%/y (0.87-2.27), and 1.20%/y (0.74-1.94), 10.15%/y (7.42-13.90) for TOF and TA, respectively. Endocarditis rate was 0.21%/y (95% CI: 0.16-0.27) for a homograft substitute and 0.80%/y (95%CI: 0.60-1.09) for a xenograft substitute. Reintervention rate for infants, children and adults was 8.80%/y (95% CI: 6.49-11.95), 4.75%/y (95% CI: 3.67-6.14), and 0.72%/y (95% CI: 0.36-1.42), respectively. Conclusion: This study shows RVOT reconstruction with valve substitutes can be performed with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates for most patients. Reinterventions after RVOT reconstruction with valve substitutes are inevitable for most patients in their life-time, emphasizing the necessity of life-long follow-up and multidisciplinary care. Follow-up protocols should be tailored to individual patients because patients with different etiologies, ages, and implanted valve substitutes have different rates of mortality and morbidity. Systematic review registration: [www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero], identifier [CRD42021271622].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.