ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2022
Orthodontic bracket bonding techniques and adhesion failures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computer-aided indirect bonding versus traditional direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: bonding accuracy and bonding failures. A split mouth randomized controlled trial.European journal of orthodontics · 2026Trial
- Comparative in vitro study of bond strength of two-step orthodontic bonding systems : Self-adhesive composite vs. self-etching primer.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026Article
- Transfer Accuracy in Digital Indirect Bonding: A Methodological Umbrella Review of Definitions, Measurement Frameworks, and Evidence Synthesis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- In vitro evaluation of the efficacy of a new orthodontic primer in metallic brackets cementation.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Tooth-level risk modeling and prediction of fixed orthodontic bracket bonding failure: a real-world retrospective cohort study.Head & face medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Two Bonding Systems on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An In Vitro Study :.Galen medical journal · 2025Article
- Experimental Bracket Design Performance on Bonding and Polymerization of Orthodontic Composite.BioMed research international · 2024Article
- Comparison of the Adhesive Remnant Index and Shear Bond Strength of Different Metal Bracket Bases on Artificially Aged Human Teeth: AnJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This systematic review compared the bonding failures of orthodontic brackets bonded by indirect or direct techniques. Data sources: The searched databases were Cochrane Library, LILACS, BBO, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science. Material and Methods: A search for randomized clinical trials comparing the two techniques was carried out to answer the research question: When considering orthodontic bracket bonding on permanent teeth, does the indirect technique reduce the number of bonding failures compared to the direct one over time? The quality of the included papers was assessed with Cochrane risk of bias tool and the quality of evidence with GRADE. Results: From 3096 articles identified, seven were included in the systematic review (five at unclear; two at low risk of bias). Meta-analysis was carried out according to the follow-up periods (0-6 months and 12-15 months). Results: In the first period, bonding techniques were similar with regard to adhesion failures (RR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.10-3.62; Conclusions: Based on the absence of heterogeneity and the high quality of evidence, it is concluded that the direct bracket bonding technique has a lower failure rate than the indirect technique in the long term (12-15 months).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.