Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36158754›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2022

Dongyu Cui, Lingchao Kong, Yi Wang, Yuanqing Zhu, Chuanlun Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Identifying Molecular Changes inDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Assessment of Drug Activities againstPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Research progress in isolation and identification of rumen probiotics.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dongyu CuiSouthern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, 511458, China.
Lingchao KongState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Integrated Surface Water-Groundwater Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science & Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Yi WangSouthern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, 511458, China.
Yuanqing ZhuDepartment of Ocean Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Chuanlun ZhangSouthern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, 511458, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microorganisms in natural environments are crucial in maintaining the material and energy cycle and the ecological balance of the environment. However, it is challenging to delineate environmental microbes' actual metabolic pathways and intraspecific heterogeneity because most microorganisms cannot be cultivated. Raman spectroscopy is a culture-independent technique that can collect molecular vibration profiles from cells. It can reveal the physiological and biochemical information at the single-cell level rapidly and non-destructively

Indexed as

Environmental microorganismsMetabolic activitiesRaman spectroscopySingle cells

Identifiers

PMID36158754
PMCPMC9488013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.