Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36158708›Full record

ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2022

Outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery in lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wenhui Zhang, Yuting Zhang, Yi Qin, Jiahai Shi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Enhanced Patient Comfort and Satisfaction with Early Oral Feeding after Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Resection.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenhui ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Yuting ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Yi QinDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Jiahai ShiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nantong Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Cardiothoracic Diseases, and Research Institution of Translational Medicine in Cardiothoracic Diseases in Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of ERAS on clinical prognosis in perioperative patients following lung cancer surgery. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other databases were systematically searched from inception to December 2021. Randomized controlled trials and peer-reviewed cohort studies on the use of ERAS in lung cancer surgery patients were included. Primary outcomes comprised visual analog scale scores after treatment and quality of life. Secondary outcomes comprised complication rate, function-related outcomes (chest tube indwelling time and first ambulation), and length of stay. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software. Results: Finally, 23 studies were included (12 cohort studies and 11 randomized controlled trials) with a total of 8094 patients. Meta-analysis showed that ERAS significantly reduced visual analog scale scores (mean difference [MD] = -1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.45, -1.54, Conclusions: ERAS can accelerate postoperative recovery and improve quality of life. These findings support the use of ERAS as a standard of care for lung cancer surgery patients. However, the evidence quality was moderate and there were significant differences among studies. More high-quality studies incorporating relevant outcomes are needed for confirmation.

Indexed as

Enhanced recovery after surgerylung cancerMeta-analysisperioperative caresystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36158708
PMCPMC9500517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.