Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36158665›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Phase 2 randomized controlled trial of intravenous or intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus mFOLFOX6 vs. mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Shen Zhao, Liyu Su, Yigui Chen, Xiaofeng Li, Peicheng Lin, Wujin Chen, Wenzheng Fang, Jinfeng Zhu, Hui Li, Liping Ren and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Catheter based intraperitoneal chemotherapy using taxane for peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer: from bench to bedside-a narrative review.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shen ZhaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Liyu SuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yigui ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Xiaofeng LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Quanzhou, China.
Peicheng LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Wujin ChenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Affiliated People's Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Wenzheng FangDepartment of Medical Oncology, The 900th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force People's Liberation Army, Fuzhou, China.
Jinfeng ZhuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Quanzhou, China.
Hui LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Liping RenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Affiliated People's Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Jie LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yanni HongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Quanzhou, China.
Shaowei LinSchool of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Nanfeng FanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Rongbo LinDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We conducted a phase 2 trial to compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous paclitaxel or intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus mFOLFOX6 vs. mFOLFOX6 in untreated advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Participants with untreated advanced gastric cancer were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to: intravenous paclitaxel 135 mg/m Results: Of 90 enrolled participants, 30 in the intravenous paclitaxel group, 29 in the intraperitoneal paclitaxel group, and 30 in the mFOLFOX6 group were included in the analyses. The median progression-free survival was 6.52, 5.83, and 4.55 months, respectively, for the intravenous paclitaxel group, intraperitoneal paclitaxel group, and mFOLFOX6 group. The hazard ratios were 0.56 (95% CI: 0.33-0.94; Conclusion: The findings of this phase 2 trial suggest that adding intravenous paclitaxel or intraperitoneal paclitaxel to mFOLFOX6 for untreated advanced gastric cancer improved progression-free survival with manageable adverse events.

Indexed as

advancedgastric cancerintraperitonealintravenouspaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID36158665
PMCPMC9491235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.