ArticleLiver cancer2022
Conventional or Drug-Eluting Beads? Randomized Controlled Study of Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: JIVROSG-1302.
Article in Liver cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Efficacy of TACE plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: 2023 Expert consensus-based practical recommendations of the Korean Liver Cancer Association.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2023Guideline
- Transarterial Embolization Alone Versus Drug-Eluting Microspheres Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (RAD-18-TAcE): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Trial
- Commentary on "Transarterial Embolization Alone Versus Drug-Eluting Microspheres Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (RAD-18-TACE): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial" Mosconi C, et al. CVIR 2026.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Selective Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Using a Glass Membrane Emulsification Device in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Clinical Trial in Japan.Liver cancer · 2026Article
- TACE plus donafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors for intermediate HCC (CHANCE2410 study): a propensity score matching analysis.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Microwave Ablation with or without TACE for Unresectable Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Impact of Tumor Burden Score on Efficacy.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
- Therapeutic embolic agents for targeted drug delivery in transcatheter therapies: a review.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Comparison of Degradable Starch Microspheres TACE with Idarubicin vs. Epirubicin Protocol in Patients with HCC.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of Procedural Quality on Outcomes of Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study.Liver cancer · 2026Article
- Extent of Embolization as an Independent Prognostic Factor in Superselective Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Vietnamese expert consensus on the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with transarterial chemoembolization.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Review
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Eastern World: Screening, Diagnosis, Staging and Treatment.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- Sequential and synergistic delivery of lipiodol and drug-eluting microspheres circumvents incompatibility to enhance targeted chemoembolization.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- High-Volume Dilution of Drug-Eluting Beads Reduces Severe Pain After DEB-TACE: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Radiomic Analysis Applied to Pretreatment Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging Predicts Response to Selective Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Article
- Targeting lactic acidosis in the tumor microenvironment: Enhancing TACE efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma.Liver research (Beijing, China) · 2025Review
- Engineered nanoparticles for imaging and targeted drug delivery in hepatocellular carcinoma.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: With the advent of effective systemic therapy, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is established as a highly effective locoregional treatment modality for carefully selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This randomized controlled trial was conducted to clarify whether selective TACE with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) loaded with epirubicin or selective conventional TACE (cTACE) with epirubicin-ethiodized oil might be more effective for obtaining complete response(CR) in patients with HCC. Methods: Between March 2016 and May 2019, Child-Pugh class A or B patients with unresectable HCC who were scheduled to receive selective TACE were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to the DEB-TACE arm or the cTACE arm. The primary endpoint was the CR rate at 3 months, as evaluated according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors by an independent review committee, and the secondary endpoints were the CR rate at 1 month and incidences of adverse events. Results: A total of 200 patients (DEB-TACE, 99 patients; cTACE, 101 patients) were enrolled in the study. The CR rates at 3 months and 1 month were significantly higher in the cTACE arm (75.2%, 84.2%) as compared with the DEB-TACE arm (27.6%, 35.7%). However, the frequencies of adverse events of any grade, including pyrexia (DEB-TACE vs. cTACE, 19.4% vs. 45.5%, Conclusions: Selective cTACE appeared to have higher CR rates for local tumor control as compared to selective DEB-TACE for HCC. However, the frequency of postembolization syndrome was also significantly higher in the cTACE group than in the DEB-TACE group. Thus, to achieve CR, cTACE may be selected over DEB-TACE in patients who can be expected to tolerate postembolization syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.