ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022
Motoric cognitive risk syndrome as a predictor of incident disability: A 7 year follow-up study.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The association between sarcopenia, sedentary behavior, and the motor cognitive risk syndrome: A Mendelian randomization study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Mediating pathways of physical capabilities: linking perceived physical fatigability to motoric cognitive risk syndrome in community older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Clinical and neuroimaging correlates of motoric cognitive risk syndrome in cerebral small vessel disease: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Cognitive and physical functions among Chinese community-dwelling older adults with motoric cognitive risk syndrome: A prospective cohort study.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Article
- From Dual Decline to Clinical Consequences: Mechanistic Pathways and Health Outcomes of Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome.Aging and disease · 2025Review
- Household fuel use and motoric cognitive risk syndrome among older adults: Evidence from cohort study and life course analysis.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- Evaluation criteria for diagnosing motoric cognitive risk syndrome: a scoping review.Dementia & neuropsychologia · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for motoric cognitive risk syndrome in older adults.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2024Article
- Predictors for the development of motoric cognitive risk syndrome in older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- "Cognitive" Criteria in Older Adults With Slow Gait Speed: Implications for Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024Review
- Associations of sarcopenia, sarcopenia parameters and motoric cognitive risk syndrome in Chinese older adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Though motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) share risk factors with disability, whether it predict disability remains understudied. Objectives: This study aims to examine the association between MCR and incident disability. Design: Longitudinal study. Methods: MCR was defined as subjective cognitive complaints and objective slow gait speed. Two subtypes of MCR were defined by whether memory impairment (MI) was also present, MCR-MI and MCR-non-MI. Incident activities of daily living (ADL) disability and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) disability were outcome measures. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess the independent effect of MCR at baseline on the odds of ADL/IADL disability at a 7 year follow-up. Results: Among the subjects who were not disabled at baseline and followed for 7 years, 34.66% reported incident ADL disability, and 31.64% reported incident IADL disability. Compared with participants without MCR at baseline, those with MCR had 58% increased odds of incident ADL disability (OR=1.58, 95% CI: 1.19-2.09) and 46% increased odds of incident IADL disability (OR=1.46, 95% CI: 1.13-1.88) after 7 years. MCR-non-MI was associated with a 56.63% increased risk of ADL disability and a 34.73% increased risk of IADL disability. MCR-MI was associated with an even higher risk of IADL disability (OR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.18-3.88). Conclusions: MCR is an independent risk factor for both incident ADL and IADL disability. MCR-MI predicts a higher risk for disability than MCR-non-MI. Early identification of MCR among older adult is recommended and may decrease future risk of disability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.