Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36158530›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2022

Spectral Preprocessing Combined with Deep Transfer Learning to Evaluate Chlorophyll Content in Cotton Leaves.

Qinlin Xiao, Wentan Tang, Chu Zhang, Lei Zhou, Lei Feng, Jianxun Shen, Tianying Yan, Pan Gao, Yong He, Na Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spectral prediction of anthocyanin concentration inFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Non-destructive estimation of SPAD and biomass inFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qinlin XiaoCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Wentan TangCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Chu ZhangSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, China.
Lei ZhouCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Lei FengCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4521-5131
Jianxun ShenHangzhou Raw Seed Growing Farm, Hangzhou 311115, China.
Tianying YanCollege of Information Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China.
Pan GaoCollege of Information Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7781-3005
Yong HeCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6752-1757
Na WuCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2654-6605

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid determination of chlorophyll content is significant for evaluating cotton's nutritional and physiological status. Hyperspectral technology equipped with multivariate analysis methods has been widely used for chlorophyll content detection. However, the model developed on one batch or variety cannot produce the same effect for another due to variations, such as samples and measurement conditions. Considering that it is costly to establish models for each batch or variety, the feasibility of using spectral preprocessing combined with deep transfer learning for model transfer was explored. Seven different spectral preprocessing methods were discussed, and a self-designed convolutional neural network (CNN) was developed to build models and conduct transfer tasks by fine-tuning. The approach combined first-derivative (FD) and standard normal variate transformation (SNV) was chosen as the best pretreatment. For the dataset of the target domain, fine-tuned CNN based on spectra processed by FD + SNV outperformed conventional partial least squares (PLS) and squares-support vector machine regression (SVR). Although the performance of fine-tuned CNN with a smaller dataset was slightly lower, it was still better than conventional models and achieved satisfactory results. Ensemble preprocessing combined with deep transfer learning could be an effective approach to estimate the chlorophyll content between different cotton varieties, offering a new possibility for evaluating the nutritional status of cotton in the field.

Identifiers

PMID36158530
PMCPMC9489230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.