ArticleBioinformatics advances2022
Integrating multimodal data through interpretable heterogeneous ensembles.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural language processing-based model to predict radiation pneumonitis in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Multimodal artificial intelligence and machine learning in oncology: from data integration to precision cancer care.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- ICU mortality prediction via multimodal learning on MIMIC-IV clinical data.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Developmental toxicity: artificial intelligence-powered assessments.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2025Review
- A machine learning approach for multimodal data fusion for survival prediction in cancer patients.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Role of Artificial Intelligence and Personalized Medicine in Enhancing HIV Management and Treatment Outcomes.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multimodal integration strategies for clinical application in oncology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Analysis of categorical data from biological experiments with logistic regression and CMH tests.PloS one · 2025Article
- Prediction of future dementia among patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by integrating multimodal clinical data.Heliyon · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Youth Diabetes Epidemiological Data Set and Web Portal: Resource Development and Case Studies.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- Low-frequency ERK and Akt activity dynamics are predictive of stochastic cell division events.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- A primer on the use of machine learning to distil knowledge from data in biological psychiatry.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Integrating multimodal data represents an effective approach to predicting biomedical characteristics, such as protein functions and disease outcomes. However, existing data integration approaches do not sufficiently address the heterogeneous semantics of multimodal data. In particular, early and intermediate approaches that rely on a uniform integrated representation reinforce the consensus among the modalities but may lose exclusive local information. The alternative late integration approach that can address this challenge has not been systematically studied for biomedical problems. Results: We propose Ensemble Integration (EI) as a novel systematic implementation of the late integration approach. EI infers local predictive models from the individual data modalities using appropriate algorithms and uses heterogeneous ensemble algorithms to integrate these local models into a global predictive model. We also propose a novel interpretation method for EI models. We tested EI on the problems of predicting protein function from multimodal STRING data and mortality due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from multimodal data in electronic health records. We found that EI accomplished its goal of producing significantly more accurate predictions than each individual modality. It also performed better than several established early integration methods for each of these problems. The interpretation of a representative EI model for COVID-19 mortality prediction identified several disease-relevant features, such as laboratory test (blood urea nitrogen and calcium) and vital sign measurements (minimum oxygen saturation) and demographics (age). These results demonstrated the effectiveness of the EI framework for biomedical data integration and predictive modeling. Availability and implementation: Code and data are available at https://github.com/GauravPandeyLab/ensemble_integration. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.