ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2022
Independent validation of a dysphagia dose response model for the selection of head and neck cancer patients to proton therapy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic models for radiation-induced complications after radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Risk prediction models for dysphagia after radiotherapy among patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of a comprehensive set of normal tissue complication probability models for patients with head and neck cancer in an international cohort.Oral oncology · 2025Article
- External validation of a multimodality deep-learning normal tissue complication probability model for mandibular osteoradionecrosis trained on 3D radiation distribution maps and clinical variables.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Predictive Factors for Chemoradiation-Induced Oral Mucositis and Dysphagia in Head and Neck Cancer: A Scoping Review.Cancers · 2023Article
- Achievements and challenges in normal tissue response modelling for proton therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: The model based approach involves the use of normal tissue complication models for selection of head and neck cancer patients to proton therapy. Our goal was to validate the clinical utility of the related dysphagia model using an independent patient cohort. Materials and Methods: A dataset of 277 head and neck cancer (pharynx and larynx) patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy between 2019 and 2021 was acquired. For the evaluation of the model discrimination we used statistical metrics such as the sensitivity, specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. After the validation we evaluated if the dysphagia model can be improved using the closed testing procedure, the Brier and the Hosmer-Lemeshow score. Results: The performance of the original normal tissue complication probability model for dysphagia grade II-IV at 6 months was good (AUC = 0.80). According to the graphical calibration assessment, the original model showed underestimated dysphagia risk predictions. The closed testing procedure indicated that the model had to be updated and selected a revised model with new predictor coefficients as an optimal model. The revised model had also satisfactory discrimination (AUC = 0.83) with improved calibration. Conclusion: The validation of the normal tissue complication probability model for grade II-IV dysphagia was successful in our independent validation cohort. However, the closed testing procedure indicated that the model should be updated with new coefficients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.