Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36158140›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2022

Dural Puncture During Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Insertion: Analysis of Practice Patterns.

Warren A Southerland, Jamal Hasoon, Ivan Urits, Omar Viswanath, Thomas T Simopoulos, Farnad Imani, Hakimeh Karimi-Aliabadi, Musa M Aner, Lynn Kohan, Jatinder Gill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Warren A SoutherlandDepartment of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4917-4485
Jamal HasoonDepartment of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8227-1864
Ivan UritsDepartment of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3652-6085
Omar ViswanathDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6124-7037
Thomas T SimopoulosDepartment of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5775-7635
Farnad ImaniPain Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0814-0772
Hakimeh Karimi-AliabadiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Musa M AnerDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Center for Pain and Spine, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Lynn KohanPain Management Center; University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Jatinder GillDepartment of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an important modality for intractable pain not amenable to less conservative measures. During percutaneous SCS lead insertion, a critical step is safe access to the epidural space, which can be complicated by a dural puncture. Objectives: In this review, we present and analyze the practices patterns in the event of a dural puncture during a SCS trial or implantation. Methods: We conducted a survey of the practice patterns regarding spinal cord stimulation therapy. The survey was administered to members of the Spine Intervention Society and American Society of Regional Anesthesia specifically inquiring decision making in case of inadvertent dural puncture during spinal cord stimulator lead insertion. Results: A maximum of 193 responded to a question regarding dural punctures while performing a SCS trial and 180 responded to a question regarding dural punctures while performing a SCS implantation. If performing a SCS trial and a dural puncture occurs, a majority of physicians chose to continue the procedure at a different level (56.99%), followed by abandoning the procedure (27.98%), continuing at the same level (10.36%), or choosing another option (4.66%). Similarly, if performing a permanent implantation and a dural puncture occurs, most physicians chose to continue the procedure at a different level (61.67%), followed by abandoning the procedure (21.67%), continuing at the same level (10.56%), or choosing another option (6.11%). Conclusions: Whereas the goals of the procedure would support abandoning the trial but continuing with the permanent in case of inadvertent dural puncture, we found that decision choices were minimally influenced by whether the dural puncture occurred during the trial or the permanent implant. The majority chose to continue with the procedure at a different level while close to a quarter chose to abandon the procedure. This article sets a time stamp in practice patterns from March 20, 2020 to June 26, 2020. These results are based on contemporary SCS practices as demonstrated by this cohort, rendering the options of abandoning or continuing after dural puncture as reasonable methods. Though more data is needed to provide a consensus, providers can now see how others manage dural punctures during SCS procedures.

Indexed as

Chronic PainDural PunctureNeuromodulationPatient SafetyPostdural Puncture HeadacheSpinal Cord Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36158140
PMCPMC9364517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.