Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36158139›Full record

ReviewAnesthesiology and pain medicine2022

Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Pain: Current Perspectives.

Amber N Edinoff, Sarah Kaufman, E Saunders Alpaugh, Jesse Lawson, Tucker L Apgar, Farnad Imani, Seyed-Hossein Khademi, Elyse M Cornett, Alan D Kaye

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Intractable Chronic Limb Ischemia: A Narrative Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amber N EdinoffDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Science Center, Shreveport, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7436-6206
Sarah KaufmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Science Center, Shreveport, LA, USA.
E Saunders AlpaughDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Science Center New Orleans, LA, USA.
Jesse LawsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Science Center, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Tucker L ApgarDepartment of Chemical Biology and Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Farnad ImaniPain Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0814-0772
Seyed-Hossein KhademiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5462-2831
Elyse M CornettDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7961-3931
Alan D KayeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2464-0187

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last several decades, opioid diversion, misuse, and over-prescription have run rampant in the United States. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been FDA approved for treatment for a primary indication of neuropathic limb pain that is resistant to more conservative medical therapy. The disorders qualified for treatment include neuropathic, post-surgical, post-amputation, osteodegenerative, and pain related to vascular disease. Some of the most frequently cited conditions for treatment of SCS include failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) Type I and Type II, and post-herpetic neuralgias. Developments in SCS systems have led to the differentiation between the delivered electromechanical waveform patterns, including tonic, burst, and high-frequency. Burst SCS mitigates traditional paresthesia due to expedited action potential and offers improved pain relief. Burst SCS has been shown in available studies to be non-inferior to the traditional SCS, which can cause pain paresthesia in patients who already have chronic pain. Burst SCS does not seem to cause or need the paresthesia seen in traditional SCS, making SCS not tolerable to patients. Moreover, some studies suggest that burst SCS may decrease opioid consumption in patients with chronic pain. This can make burst SCS an extremely useful tool in the battle against chronic pain and the raging opioid epidemic. As of now, more research needs to be performed to further delineate the effectiveness and long-term safety of this device.

Indexed as

Burst StimulationChronic Pain ManagementComplex Regional Pain SyndromeFailed Back Surgery SyndromeNeuropathic PainSpinal Cord Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36158139
PMCPMC9364520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.