Trial reportComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
The Impact of Improved Oral Care Methods on the Oral Health of Patients Undergoing Transoral Mechanical Ventilation.
Trial report in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolving aspects of oral care in modern nursing: a systematic review.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Revisiting Oral Antiseptics, Microorganism Targets and Effectiveness.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Retracted: The Impact of Improved Oral Care Methods on the Oral Health of Patients Undergoing Transoral Mechanical Ventilation.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-19Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Human Subject Welfare · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/7A06D4860BB51619FFAF01C0D3776F
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effects of improved oral care on the number of oropharyngeal bacteria and the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation through oral endotracheal intubation by improving conventional oral care methods and operating procedures and to evaluate the quality of improved oral care and effect. Methods: A total of 100 cases of mechanically ventilated patients with oral endotracheal intubation who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into the observation group and control group with 50 cases each. The control group took routine oral care, that is, scrubbing 3 times per day, and the oral care solution was selected as physiological brine. The observation group improved the conventional oral care method, namely, oral scrubbing before intubation, brushing and washing after intubation, 3 times per day, and 0.1% povidone-iodine in oral care solution. Analysis and comparison of the oral bacterial flora, oral cleanliness, and incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, mechanical ventilation time, ICU hospitalization time, and mortality rate of the two groups of patients were analyzed and compared. The relevant data were collected and processed for statistical processing. Results: The oral bacterial flora of the two groups of patients before oral care after mechanical ventilation after oral tracheal intubation was compared, and there was no significant statistical difference ( Conclusion: Oral care can effectively reduce the number of oropharyngeal bacteria in patients who are mechanically ventilated through orotracheal intubation and significantly reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.