ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Sinus tarsi approach in high-risk patients with displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures: A case series.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Surgery and Screw-Only Osteosyntheses in Minimally Invasive Treatment of Calcaneal Fractures-Risk or Benefit for Our Patients?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Outcomes of U-shaped internal fixation in the treatment of avulsion fracture of calcaneal tubercle.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Though research exists regarding calcaneal fractures, the treatment approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF) remains controversial. The most common approach, the extensile lateral approach (ELA), for the treatment of DIACFs has high rates of wound complications reported. In contrast, the sinus tarsi approach (STA) is becoming more popular due to its minimally invasive technique. The objective of this retrospective study is to investigate the incidence of wound complications in high-risk patients with DIACF following operative fixation via the STA. Methods: Following IRB approval, a retrospective chart review was performed between 2007 and 2013 to assess high-risk patients for the presence of wound complications, including deep infections and delayed wound healing, following the use of STA for the management of DIACF's (n = 36). Demographics, risk factors, and secondary outcomes such as time to surgery were recorded. Results: Of the 36 high-risk patients included in our study, seven had post-operative complications following operative fixation via the STA. Specifically, four patients had delayed wound healing, and three developed deep infections. Time to surgery had the greatest negative effect on postoperative complications and was influenced by age, sex, and the presence of a concomitant injury. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the STA is a viable option for high-risk patients with displaced intra-articular fractures. Additionally, time to surgery should be minimized, when possible, to reduce risks of post-operative complications, including infections and delayed wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.