ReviewJournal of lifestyle medicine2022
Recent Advances in Chest Rehabilitation during COVID-19 Outbreak: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of lifestyle medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The current COVID-19 pandemic has brought the entire world to a halt, resulting in illness, death, and changes in individual roles. Physical therapy and chest rehabilitation play a critical role following aftermath of pandemics. Methods: PubMed, Google Scholar, PEDro, MEDLINE were searched for randomized controlled trials. Methodological quality was assessed independently by two authors using PEDro scale. Data for disability, chest physical functions and adverse effects were analyzed. Results: A meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of the studies included for review. After applying the studies' inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of eight articles with 420 patients were included in the study for their detailed analysis. Two independent authors verified and screened the data, with the third author double-checked and searched for additional articles. Conclusion: Findings revealed that chest rehabilitation approaches influence the clinical condition of people during COVID-19 outbreak resulting in improved condition stabilization and recovery, the consequent reduction in hospitalization period and improved health-related quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.