Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157850›Full record

ReviewCurrent developments in nutrition2022

Optimizing Maternal Nutrition: The Importance of a Tailored Approach.

Lauren R Brink, Tonya M Bender, Rosalind Davies, Hanqi Luo, Derek Miketinas, Neil Shah, Nik Loveridge, Gabriele Gross, Neil Fawkes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current developments in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lauren R BrinkMedical and Scientific Affairs, Reckitt/Mead Johnson Nutrition Institute, Evansville, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0191-5168
Tonya M BenderMedical and Scientific Affairs, Reckitt/Mead Johnson Nutrition Institute, Evansville, IN, USA.
Rosalind DaviesMedical and Scientific Affairs, Reckitt/Mead Johnson Nutrition Institute, Slough, UK.
Hanqi LuoEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6253-5818
Derek MiketinasNutrition and Food Sciences, Texas Woman's University, Houston, TX, USA.
Neil ShahMedical and Scientific Affairs, Reckitt/Mead Johnson Nutrition Institute, Slough, UK.
Nik LoveridgeMedical and Scientific Affairs, Reckitt/Mead Johnson Nutrition Institute, Slough, UK.
Gabriele GrossMedical and Scientific Affairs, Reckitt/Mead Johnson Nutrition Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Neil FawkesMedical and Scientific Affairs, Reckitt/Mead Johnson Nutrition Institute, Slough, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving nutritional status during pregnancy is a global interest. Frequently, women either fail to meet or exceed nutrient recommendations. Current strategies to improve maternal nutrition focus on a "one-size-fits-all" approach and fail to consider individual factors that affect the mother's overall nutritional status. The objectives of this review were to determine the importance of key nutrients for optimal maternal and fetal health, to explore to what extent current recommendations consider individual factors, and to explore novel strategies to close the gap between current guidelines and real-world challenges through more personalized approaches. This review intercalated different nutritional guidelines and recent scientific publications and research initiatives related to maternal nutrition. Based on that, an overview of current recommendations, challenges related to present approaches, and perspectives for future directions are described. Current guidelines are not optimally supporting adequate nutrient intake and health of expectant mothers and their offspring. Existing recommendations are not consistent and do not sufficiently take into account how interindividual variation leads to differences in nutrient status. Personalized nutrition offers women the opportunity to improve their health by using strategies that are tailored to their unique nutritional needs. Such strategies can include personalized supplementation, holistic lifestyle interventions, digital and application-based technologies, and dietary assessment through blood biomarker and genetic analysis. However, these approaches warrant further investigation and optimization. More personalized approaches have the potential to optimize mothers' and their offspring's health outcomes more appropriately to their nutritional needs before, during, and after pregnancy. Moving away from a generalized "one-size-fits-all" approach can be achieved through a variety of means. Future aims should be to provide supporting evidence to create customized subpopulation-based or individualized recommendations, improve nutrition education, and develop novel approaches to improve adherence to dietary and lifestyle interventions.

Indexed as

nutritionpersonalizationpregnancysupplementstailored approach

Identifiers

PMID36157850
PMCPMC9492153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.