ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2022
A neuro-inspired computational model of life-long learning and catastrophic interference, mimicking hippocampus novelty-based dopamine modulation and lateral inhibitory plasticity.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human brain has a remarkable lifelong learning capability to acquire new experiences while retaining previously acquired information. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain this capability, but the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. Here, we propose a neuro-inspired firing-rate computational model involving the hippocampus and surrounding areas, that encompasses two key mechanisms possibly underlying this capability. The first is based on signals encoded by the neuromodulator dopamine, which is released by novel stimuli and enhances plasticity only when needed. The second is based on a homeostatic plasticity mechanism that involves the lateral inhibitory connections of the pyramidal neurons of the hippocampus. These mechanisms tend to protect neurons that have already been heavily employed in encoding previous experiences. The model was tested with images from the MNIST machine learning dataset, and with more naturalistic images, for its ability to mitigate catastrophic interference in lifelong learning. The results show that the proposed biologically grounded mechanisms can effectively enhance the learning of new stimuli while protecting previously acquired knowledge. The proposed mechanisms could be investigated in future empirical animal experiments and inspire machine learning models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.