Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157805›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2022

Assessment tools for differential diagnosis of neglect: Focusing on egocentric neglect and allocentric neglect.

Sang-Hyeok Lee, Byeong-Chan Lim, Chan-Young Jeong, Jun-Hyeok Kim, Woo-Hyuk Jang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sang-Hyeok LeeDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Kangwon National University, Gangwon-do 25949, South Korea.
Byeong-Chan LimDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Kangwon National University, Gangwon-do 25949, South Korea.
Chan-Young JeongDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Kangwon National University, Gangwon-do 25949, South Korea.
Jun-Hyeok KimDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Kangwon National University, Gangwon-do 25949, South Korea.
Woo-Hyuk JangDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Kangwon National University, Gangwon-do 25949, South Korea. wlqtksek@hanmail.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are very few studies on the differential diagnosis between egocentric neglect (EN) and allocentric neglect (AN).

aimTo investigate the overall trend of the previously developed assessment tools by conducting a descriptive review of the studies on assessment tools that can perform a differential diagnosis of EN and AN.

methodsThe data were collected by using databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. The most commonly used search terms were "neglect", "stroke", "egocentric neglect", and "allocentric neglect".

resultsA total of seven studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected and analyzed. We were able to confirm the research process, test method, and differential diagnosis criteria of the seven presented assessment tools from four studies on paper-based tests and three studies on computerized tests. The majority of the tests were carried out

conclusionIt was confirmed that all the seven assessment tools can effectively perform differential diagnosis of EN and AN. This study may provide important data that can be used in clinical practice for differential diagnosis and future intervention planning for neglect patients.

Indexed as

Allocentric neglectAssessment toolsBrain damageCancellationEgocentric neglect

Identifiers

PMID36157805
PMCPMC9453377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.