ReviewACS omega2022
Expanding the Scope of Nanobiocatalysis and Nanosensing: Applications of Nanomaterial Constructs.
Review in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biocatalytic and biogenic pathways for sustainable nanoparticle synthesis: mechanisms, monitoring, and circular bioeconomy integration.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026Review
- Ligand exchange on nanocrystals: fundamental mechanisms, regulation of nanocrystal properties, self-assembly, and advanced applications.Nanoscale advances · 2026Review
- Systematic Review on the Role of Microfluidic Platforms in Advancing Scalable and Precise Microbial Bioprocessing.Engineering in life sciences · 2025Review
- Advancements in nanomaterials for nanosensors: a comprehensive review.Nanoscale advances · 2024Review
- Nanofood Process Technology: Insights on How Sustainability Informs Process Design.ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2023Article
- Comparison of covalent and in situ immobilization of3 Biotech · 2023Article
- Advanced visual sensing techniques for on-site detection of pesticide residue in water environments.Heliyon · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The synergistic interaction between advanced biotechnology and nanotechnology has allowed the development of innovative nanomaterials. Those nanomaterials can conveniently act as supports for enzymes to be employed as nanobiocatalysts and nanosensing constructs. These systems generate a great capacity to improve the biocatalytic potential of enzymes by improving their stability, efficiency, and product yield, as well as facilitating their purification and reuse for various bioprocessing operating cycles. The different specific physicochemical characteristics and the supramolecular nature of the nanocarriers obtained from different economical and abundant sources have allowed the continuous development of functional nanostructures for different industries such as food and agriculture. The remarkable biotechnological potential of nanobiocatalysts and nanosensors has generated applied research and use in different areas such as biofuels, medical diagnosis, medical therapies, environmental bioremediation, and the food industry. The objective of this work is to present the different manufacturing strategies of nanomaterials with various advantages in biocatalysis and nanosensing of various compounds in the industry, providing great benefits to society and the environment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.