Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157715›Full record

ArticleSexuality & culture2023

Pornography and the Erotic Phantasmagoria.

David Rosen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexuality & culture, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David RosenNew York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7519-1882

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Susan Sontag, in her classic 1967 essay, "The Pornographic Imagination," argued: "Tamed as it may be, sexuality remains one of the demonic forces in human consciousness …. "In the last half-century, Sontag's demonic force of sexuality has transformed pornography and the "pornographic imagination"-let along social relations between women and men. In this essay, I adopt Walter Benjamin's concept of phantasmagoria-a magic-lantern show of optical illusions, rapidly changing size and blending into one another-as the metaphoric commodity form of postmodern capitalist society, fetishism-on-display. I examine the evolution of technological forms of pornographic representation over the last two centuries, including the magiclantern, daguerreotype, photography, stereoscope and film as well as the internet, erotic toys, electronic devises, VR and sex robots. These developments are set against a background of equally profound legal and cultural developments that have recast the sexuality of postmodern America. I argue that these (and other) developments have recast patriarchy and, in some important ways, the sexual relations between "consenting" adults. I conclude reflecting on the current intellectual and political debate about pornography between "pro-sex" and "anti-sex" feminists. With the enormous increase in the production and availability of pornography, I ask, perhaps "quantity" can give way to improved "quality"? I ask whether today's sexual phantasmagoria can fashion a "new" feminist sexuality-and a more humane pornography?

Indexed as

Erotic representationPhantasmagoriaPornogaphySusan Sontag

Identifiers

PMID36157715
PMCPMC9485786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.