Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157712›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

Pandemic fatigue or enduring precautionary behaviours? Canadians' long-term response to COVID-19 public health measures.

Gabrielle Brankston, Eric Merkley, Peter J Loewen, Brent P Avery, Carolee A Carson, Brendan P Dougherty, David N Fisman, Ashleigh R Tuite, Zvonimir Poljak, Amy L Greer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Health as a means to flourishing.European journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Trends in Testing for SARS-CoV-2 Among Healthcare Workers in a Canadian Cohort Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic, June 2020 to November 2023.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Heterogeneous risk tolerance, in-groups, and epidemic waves.Frontiers in applied mathematics and statistics · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gabrielle BrankstonDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Canada.
Eric MerkleyDepartment of Political Science, University of Toronto, Canada.
Peter J LoewenMunk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, University of Toronto, Canada.
Brent P AveryCentre for Foodborne, Environmental and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada.
Carolee A CarsonCentre for Foodborne, Environmental and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada.
Brendan P DoughertyCentre for Foodborne, Environmental and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada.
David N FismanDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada.
Ashleigh R TuiteDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada.
Zvonimir PoljakDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Canada.
Amy L GreerDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The long-term dynamics of COVID-19 disease incidence and public health measures may impact individuals' precautionary behaviours as well as support for measures. The objectives of this study were to assess longitudinal changes in precautionary behaviours and support for public health measures. Survey data were collected online from 1030 Canadians in each of 5 cycles in 2020: June 15-July 13; July 22-Aug 8; Sept 7-15; Oct 14-21; and Nov 12-17. Precautionary behaviour increased over the study period in the context of increasing disease incidence. When controlling for the stringency of public health measures and disease incidence, mixed effects logistic regression models showed these behaviours did not significantly change over time. Odds ratios for avoiding contact with family and friends ranged from 0.84 (95% CI 0.59-1.20) in September to 1.25 (95% CI 0.66-2.37) in November compared with July 2020. Odds ratios for attending an indoor gathering ranged from 0.86 (95% CI 0.62-1.20) in August to 1.71 (95% CI 0.95-3.09) in October compared with July 2020. Support for non-essential business closures increased over time with 2.33 (95% CI 1.14-4.75) times higher odds of support in November compared to July 2020. Support for school closures declined over time with lower odds of support in September (OR 0.66 [95% CI 0.45-0.96]), October (OR 0.48 [95% CI 0.26-0.87]), and November (OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.19-0.81]) compared with July 2020. In summary, respondents' behaviour mirrored government guidance between July and November 2020 and supported individual precautionary behaviour and limitations on non-essential businesses over school closures.

Indexed as

COVID-19Longitudinal surveyPrecautionary behaviourPublic health measures

Identifiers

PMID36157712
PMCPMC9484096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.