Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157655›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2022

Successful resection of a huge retroperitoneal venous hemangioma: A case report.

Yan Qin, Peng Qiao, Xing Guan, Song Zeng, Xiao-Peng Hu, Biao Wang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Retroperitoneal ovarian venous hemangioma: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yan QinDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Peng QiaoDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Xing GuanDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Song ZengDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Xiao-Peng HuDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Biao WangDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China. wangbiao6176@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenous hemangioma is a benign and non-invasive type of tumor, which is rarely identified due to the absence of clinical manifestations. A retroperitoneal benign tumor is comparatively rare, and hemangioma is exceptional. Because of the different types and locations of hemangioma, presentations are varied; thus, establishing an accurate diagnosis before surgery is challenging. CASE SUMMARY: A 45-year-old female patient visited our hospital with the complaint of a retroperitoneal mass without symptoms discovered during a medical examination. An abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) revealed a giant hypodense mass that extended from the lower edge of the liver down to the right groin and showed no marked enhancement in the arterial phase of the enhanced CT. On magnetic resonance imaging, the retroperitoneal mass was hyperintense on the T2-weighted image and hypointense on the T1-weighted image. The mass was completely resected and confirmed as a venous hemangioma by pathology.

conclusionVenous hemangioma is rare in adults, and an accurate diagnosis before surgery is challenging. Surgery is the curative treatment for venous hemangioma, and the definitive diagnosis relies on pathology.

Indexed as

Case reportDiagnosisRetroperitoneal hemangiomaVenous hemangioma

Identifiers

PMID36157655
PMCPMC9477053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.