ReviewNeurology. Clinical practice2022
Perioperative Neurocognitive Screening Tools for At-Risk Surgical Patients.
Review in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The diagnostic accuracy of the Mini-Cog screening tool for the detection of cognitive impairment-A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Promoting brain health in older surgical patients: A pre-post evaluation of an educational module.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Feasibility of the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (M-TICS) in the peri-operative environment.Anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Perioperative dynamic EEG patterns correlated with changes in cognitive subdomains.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Article
- Perioperative cognitive dysfunction in bladder cancer patients, causal factors, and possible interventions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Effects of ketamine on postoperative cognition: a scoping review.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Effect of Cerebrolysin on Cognitive Function and Delirium in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Patient-Reported Postoperative Neuropsychological Deterioration After Heart Valve Replacement and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.CJC open · 2024Article
- Neuropsychological and biopsychosocial evolution, therapeutic adherence and unmet care needs during paediatric transplantation: study protocol of a mixed-methods design (observational cohort study and focus groups) - the TransplantKIDS mental health project.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Different Types of Intraoperative Hypotension and their Association with Post-Anesthesia Care Unit Recovery.Global heart · 2023Article
- A systematic review of predictive accuracy via c-statistic of preoperative frailty tests for extended length of stay, post-operative complications, and mortality.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose of Review: Perioperative neurocognitive disorders are common after surgery and have serious socioeconomic impacts. Despite this, these disorders remain under-recognized and underdiagnosed. To facilitate detection and direct patients toward appropriate preventative interventions, assessment of cognition during the perioperative period is of critical importance. However, there are considerable barriers to the widespread clinical implementation of cognitive assessments, including a lack of consensus regarding the optimal tool for use in specific clinical scenarios. Recent Findings: We provide an overview of the most widely used and validated cognitive assessment tools, including those that permit telemedicine-enabled patient encounters. Summary: No single tool is optimal for all contexts. This narrative review can help clinicians to identify the appropriate cognitive screening tool for their needs by describing the advantages and disadvantages of several available tools, thereby enabling the identification of patients at risk of cognitive decline and facilitating optimization of patient-focused perioperative care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.