ArticleCurrent research in toxicology2022
Genome-wide expression screening in the cardiac embryonic stem cell test shows additional differentiation routes that are regulated by morpholines and piperidines.
Article in Current research in toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cardiac embryonic stem cell test (ESTc) is a well-studied non-animal alternative test method based on cardiac cell differentiation inhibition as a measure for developmental toxicity of tested chemicals. In the ESTc, a heterogenic cell population is generated besides cardiomyocytes. Using the full biological domain of ESTc may improve the sensitivity of the test system, possibly broadening the range of chemicals for which developmental effects can be detected in the test. In order to improve our knowledge of the biological and chemical applicability domains of the ESTc, we applied a hypothesis-generating data-driven approach on control samples as follows. A genome-wide expression screening was performed, using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), to map the range of developmental pathways in the ESTc and to search for a predictive embryotoxicity biomarker profile, instead of the conventional read-out of beating cardiomyocytes. The detected developmental pathways included circulatory system development, skeletal system development, heart development, muscle and organ tissue development, and nervous system and cell development. Two pesticidal chemical classes, the morpholines and piperidines, were assessed for perturbation of differentiation in the ESTc using NGS. In addition to the anticipated impact on cardiomyocyte differentiation, the other developmental pathways were also regulated, in a concentration-response fashion. Despite the structural differences between the morpholine and piperidine pairs, their gene expression effect patterns were largely comparable. In addition, some chemical-specific gene regulation was also observed, which may help with future mechanistic understanding of specific effects with individual test compounds. These similar and unique regulations of gene expression profiles by the test compounds, adds to our knowledge of the chemical applicability domain, specificity and sensitivity of the ESTc. Knowledge of both the biological and chemical applicability domain contributes to the optimal placement of ESTc in test batteries and in Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.