Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157577›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

Automated and parallelized spike collision tests to identify spike signal projections.

Keita Mitani, Masanori Kawabata, Yoshikazu Isomura, Yutaka Sakai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Temporally Coordinated Activity among Motor Cortex, Thalamus, and Thalamic Reticular Nucleus Neurons during Rat Forelimb Movements.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Synergistic Reinforcement Learning by Cooperation of the Cerebellum and Basal Ganglia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Keita MitaniBrain Science Institute, Tamagawa University, Machida, Tokyo, Japan.
Masanori KawabataBrain Science Institute, Tamagawa University, Machida, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshikazu IsomuraBrain Science Institute, Tamagawa University, Machida, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka SakaiBrain Science Institute, Tamagawa University, Machida, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spike collision test is a highly reliable technique to identify the axonal projection of a neuron recorded electrophysiologically for investigating functional spike information among brain areas. It is potentially applicable to more neuronal projections by combining multi-channel recording with optogenetic stimulation. Yet, it remains inefficient and laborious because an experimenter must visually select spikes in every channel and manually repeat spike collision tests for each neuron serially. Here, we automated spike collision tests for all channels in parallel (

Indexed as

Biological sciences research methodologiesControl SystemsTechniques in neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID36157577
PMCPMC9490030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.