Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157517›Full record

ArticleAutopsy & case reports2022

Benign glandular schwannoma.

Khaldoon Aljerian

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Autopsy & case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Khaldoon AljerianKing Saud University, College of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6690-3155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a case of a benign glandular schwannoma in a 63-year-old male who presented with a solitary subcutaneous mass on the left knee, with no previous history of neurofibromatosis type 1. This histological subtype is rare, with only 38 cases reported in the literature. Some of the glands found in this patient resembled sweat glands. These lining stromal spindle cells were positive for S-100 but negative for EMA. S100 was faintly staining the glandular elements. All the glands in the tumor were positive for EMA, particularly at the luminal borders. They were also positive for pancytokeratin. The cystic areas variably show intraluminal, foamy, and hemosiderin-laden macrophages. The different glands expressed two patterns. Some of these were reactive for CK7 and low molecular weight keratin. Immunohistochemical workup is mandatory to assess the neoplastic nature of this glandular component.

Indexed as

Glandular schwannomaimmunohistochemistryneurilemmomasweat glands neplasms

Identifiers

PMID36157517
PMCPMC9484471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.