Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157391›Full record

Trial reportJournal of sports science & medicine2022

Comparison of The Effect of High- and Low-Frequency Vibration Foam Rolling on The Quadriceps Muscle.

Masatoshi Nakamura, Kazuki Kasahara, Riku Yoshida, Yuta Murakami, Ryoma Koizumi, Shigeru Sato, Kosuke Takeuchi, Satoru Nishishita, Xin Ye, Andreas Konrad

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Masatoshi NakamuraFaculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Nishi Kyushu University, Kanzaki, Saga, Japan.
Kazuki KasaharaInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Riku YoshidaInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Yuta MurakamiInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Ryoma KoizumiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata City, Niigata, Japan.
Shigeru SatoInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Kosuke TakeuchiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kobe International University, Hyogo, Japan.
Satoru NishishitaInstitute of Rehabilitation Science, Tokuyukai Medical Corporation, Osaka, Japan.
Xin YeDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hartford, West Hartford, USA.
Andreas KonradInstitute of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, Graz University, Mozartgasse 14, Graz, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF J 4484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vibration foam rolling (VFR) intervention has recently gained attention in sports and rehabilitation settings since the superimposed vibration with foam rolling can affect several physiological systems. However, the sustained effect and a comparison of the effects of different VFR vibration frequencies on flexibility and muscle strength have not been examined. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the acute and sustained effects of three 60-s sets of VFR with different frequencies on knee flexion range of motion (ROM) and muscle strength of the knee extensors. Using a crossover, random allocation design, 16 male university students (21.2 ± 0.6 years) performed under two conditions: VFR with low (35 Hz) and high (67 Hz) frequencies. The acute and sustained effects (20 min after intervention) of VFR on knee flexion ROM, maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVC-ISO) torque, maximum voluntary concentric contraction (MVC-CON) torque, rate of force development (RFD), and single-leg countermovement jump (CMJ) height were examined. Our results showed that knee flexion ROM increased significantly (p < 0.01) immediately after the VFR intervention and remained elevated up to 20 min, regardless of the vibration frequency. MVC-ISO and MVC-CON torque both decreased significantly (p < 0.01) immediately after the VFR intervention and remained significantly lowered up to 20 min, regardless of the vibration frequency. However, there were no significant changes in RFD or CMJ height. Our results suggest that VFR can increase knee flexion ROM but induces a decrease in muscle strength up to 20 min after VFR at both high and low frequencies.

Indexed as

Quadriceps MuscleVibrationHumansIsometric ContractionMaleMuscle StrengthTorquecountermovement jumpflexibilityFoam rollermaximal voluntary muscle contractionprolonged effectrate of force development

Identifiers

PMID36157391
PMCPMC9459764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.