Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157388›Full record

ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2022

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing with Elastic Resistance: A New Reproducible Proposal for Determination of Ventilatory Thresholds and Maximum Oxygen Consumption.

Victor H Gasparini Neto, Leticia N Santos Neves, Carlos A Kalva-Filho, Paulo A Schwingel, Richard D Leite, Luciana Carletti

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Eight Weeks ofNutrients · 2023
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victor H Gasparini NetoLaboratory of Exercise Physiology (LAFEX), Center of Physical Education and Sports (CEFD), Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória/ES, Brazil.
Leticia N Santos NevesLaboratory of Exercise Physiology (LAFEX), Center of Physical Education and Sports (CEFD), Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória/ES, Brazil.
Carlos A Kalva-FilhoLaboratory of Applied Sports Science (LACAE), Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Alagoas (UFAL) - Maceió/AL, Brazil.
Paulo A SchwingelHuman Performance Research Laboratory, University of Pernambuco (UPE), Petrolina/PE, Brazil.
Richard D LeiteLaboratory of Exercise Physiology (LAFEX), Center of Physical Education and Sports (CEFD), Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória/ES, Brazil.
Luciana CarlettiLaboratory of Exercise Physiology (LAFEX), Center of Physical Education and Sports (CEFD), Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória/ES, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BRUniversidade Federal de Alagoas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To propose a new Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test with Elastic Resistance (CPxEL) and compare the physiological responses to conventional cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPx) performed on a treadmill. In addition, we tested the reproducibility of the CPxEL. Twenty-four physically active participants completed the CPx (first session) and CPxEL twice (second and third sessions) interspersed by seven days. A treadmill protocol with increments of 1km·h

Indexed as

Exercise TestRubberHeart RateHumansOxygen ConsumptionReproducibility of ResultsRubberaccessibilityCardiopulmonary exercise testexercise testingventilatory thresholds

Identifiers

PMID36157388
PMCPMC9459769
OpenAlexW4292208747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.