Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157371›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2022

Percutaneous direct endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy.

Manoj A Vyawahare, Sushant Gulghane, Rajkumar Titarmare, Tushar Bawankar, Prashant Mudaliar, Rahul Naikwade, Jayesh M Timane

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Management of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis.World journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manoj A VyawahareDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, American Oncology Institute at Nangia Specialty Hospital, Nagpur 440028, Maharashtra, India. drmanojvyawahare@gmail.com.
Sushant GulghaneDepartment of Internal Medicine and Critical Care, American Oncology Institute at Nangia Specialty Hospital, MIDC Hingna, Nagpur 440028, Maharashtra, India.
Rajkumar TitarmareDepartment of Anaesthesiology, American Oncology Institute at Nangia Specialty Hospital, MIDC Hingna, Nagpur 440028, Maharashtra, India.
Tushar BawankarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, American Oncology Institute at Nangia Specialty Hospital, MIDC Hingna, Nagpur 440028, Maharashtra, India.
Prashant MudaliarDepartment of Radiology, American Oncology Institute at Nangia Specialty Hospital, MIDC Hingna, Nagpur 440028, Maharashtra, India.
Rahul NaikwadeDepartment of Surgery, American Oncology Institute at Nangia Specialty Hospital, MIDC Hingna, Nagpur 440028, Maharashtra, India.
Jayesh M TimaneDepartment of Internal Medicine and Critical Care, American Oncology Institute at Nangia Specialty Hospital, MIDC Hingna, Nagpur 440028, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 10%-20% of the cases of acute pancreatitis have acute necrotizing pancreatitis. The infection of pancreatic necrosis is typically associated with a prolonged course and poor prognosis. The multidisciplinary, minimally invasive "step-up" approach is the cornerstone of the management of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN). Endosonography-guided transmural drainage and debridement is the preferred and minimally invasive technique for those with IPN. However, it is technically not feasible in patients with early pancreatic/peripancreatic fluid collections (PFC) (< 2-4 wk) where the wall has not formed; in PFC in paracolic gutters/pelvis; or in walled off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) distant from the stomach/duodenum. Percutaneous drainage of these infected PFC or WOPN provides rapid infection control and patient stabilization. In a subset of patients where sepsis persists and necrosectomy is needed, the sinus drain tract between WOPN and skin-established after percutaneous drainage or surgical necrosectomy drain, can be used for percutaneous direct endoscopic necrosectomy (PDEN). There have been technical advances in PDEN over the last two decades. An esophageal fully covered self-expandable metal stent, like the lumen-apposing metal stent used in transmural direct endoscopic necrosectomy, keeps the drainage tract patent and allows easy and multiple passes of the flexible endoscope while performing PDEN. There are several advantages to the PDEN procedure. In expert hands, PDEN appears to be an effective, safe, and minimally invasive adjunct to the management of IPN and may particularly be considered when a conventional drain is

Indexed as

Direct endoscopic necrosectomyInfected pancreatic necrosisPercutaneous endoscopic necrosectomySinus tract endoscopyStent-assisted percutaneous direct endoscopic necrosectomy

Identifiers

PMID36157371
PMCPMC9453331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.