Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157364›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2022

Over-the-scope-grasper: A new tool for pancreatic necrosectomy and beyond - first multicenter experience.

Markus Brand, Jeannine Bachmann, Christoph Schlag, Ulrich Huegle, Imdadur Rahman, Edris Wedi, Benjamin Walter, Oliver Möschler, Lukas Sturm, Alexander Meining

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Infected pancreatic necrosis-Current trends in management.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Markus BrandDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University of Würzburg, Würzburg 97080, Germany. brand_m@ukw.de.
Jeannine BachmannDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, University of München, München 81675, Germany.
Christoph SchlagDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Zürich, Zürich 8091, Switzerland.
Ulrich HuegleDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Klinikum Köln-Holweide, Köln 50968, Germany.
Imdadur RahmanDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.
Edris WediDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventionell Endoscopy, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach 63069, Germany.
Benjamin WalterDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University of Ulm, Ulm 89070, Germany.
Oliver MöschlerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Marienhospital Osnabrück, Osnabrück 49074, Germany.
Lukas SturmDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University of Freiburg, Freiburg 79106, Germany.
Alexander MeiningDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University of Würzburg, Würzburg 97080, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic treatment of pancreatic necrosis can be challenging and time-consuming because sticky necrotic debris is sometimes difficult to remove. The over-the-scope-grasper, a new tool that has recently become available for this purpose, might also be useful for other indications. However, clinical data on the efficacy and safety of this new device are lacking.

aimTo evaluate the technical success and safety of the device in a multicenter setting.

methodsThe over-the-scope-grasper was used in nine selected endoscopic centers between November 2020 and October 2021 for appropriate indications. Overall, 56 procedures were included in the study. We retrospectively evaluated procedural parameters of all endoscopic interventions using a predefined questionnaire, with special respect to technical success, indications, duration of intervention, type of sedation, and complications. In the case of pancreatic necrosectomy, the access route, stent type, number of necrosis pieces removed, and clinical handling were also recorded.

resultsA total of 56 procedures were performed, with an overall technical success rate of 98%. Most of the procedures were endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomies (33 transgastric, 4 transduodenal). In 70% of the procedures, access to the necrotic cavity was established with a lumen apposing metal stent. The technical success of pancreatic necrosectomy was 97%, with a mean of 8 pieces (range, 2-25 pieces) of necrosis removed in a mean procedure time of 59 min (range, 15-120 min). In addition, the device has been used to remove blood clots (

conclusionThese first multicenter data demonstrate that the over-the-scope-grasper is a promising device for endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy, which is also appropriate for removing foreign bodies and blood clots, or cleaning insufficiency cavities prior to endoluminal vacuum therapy.

Indexed as

Direct endoscopic necrosectomyEndoscopic pancreatic necrosectomyEndoscopic toolGrasperOver-the-scope-grasperPancreatic necrosis

Identifiers

PMID36157364
PMCPMC9453329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.