Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157331›Full record

ArticlePsychology, crime & law : PC & L2022

Development of the FORUM: a new patient and clinician reported outcome measure for forensic mental health services.

Howard Ryland, Jonathan Cook, Rob Ferris, Sarah Markham, Christian Sales, Raymond Fitzpatrick, Seena Fazel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology, crime & law : PC & L, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Howard RylandDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5287-555X
Jonathan CookNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4156-6989
Rob FerrisJames Nash House Forensic Mental Health Service, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0607-0563
Sarah MarkhamInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8755-5935
Christian SalesNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Raymond FitzpatrickNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0607-0563
Seena FazelDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5383-5365

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2017-10-019HSRD VA CDA 10-019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic mental health services provide care to people in secure psychiatric hospitals and via specialised community teams. Such services are typically low volume and high cost, often highly restrictive and average duration of inpatient care prior to discharge is long. Measuring outcomes of care is important to safeguard patients and the public, monitor progress, inform treatment plans and assist in service evaluation and planning. We describe the development in England of a new outcome measure for forensic mental health services. Patient interviews and multistakeholder focus groups were held to elicit key concepts. Thematic analysis was used to develop an outcomes framework. Fifteen patients participated in the interviews and 48 stakeholders in the focus groups. Six domains were identified in thematic analysis: 'about me, my quality of life, my health, my safety and risk, my life skills and my progress'. Sixty-two stakeholders participated in the first round of the Delphi process, and 49 completed round two. Eight of the top fifteen outcomes were shared between patients/carers and professionals. Based on these results, a new outcome measure, the FORensic oUtcome Measure (FORUM), was developed including both a patient reported and clinician reported measure. Further assessment of the FORUM's use to track patients' progress over time, and facilitate shared decision-making and care planning, is required.

Indexed as

CROMDelphiforensicOutcomesPROM

Identifiers

PMID36157331
PMCPMC7613634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.