Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157266›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics2022

Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in post-stroke patients does not impact mortality, complications, or outcomes.

Kavya M Reddy, Preston Lee, Parul J Gor, Antonio Cheesman, Noor Al-Hammadi, David John Westrich, Jason Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kavya M ReddyVatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States. kavya036@gmail.com.
Preston LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA 95128, United States.
Parul J GorDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mercy Hospital, Saint Louis, MO 63141, United States.
Antonio CheesmanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63104, United States.
Noor Al-HammadiSaint Louis University Center for Health Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO 63104, United States.
David John WestrichDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63104, United States.
Jason TaylorDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63104, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPercutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are often placed for dysphagia following a stroke in order to maintain sufficient caloric intake. The 2011 ASGE guidelines recommend delaying PEG tube placement for two weeks, as half of patients with dysphagia improve within 2 wk. There are few studies comparing outcomes based on timing of PEG tube placement, and there is increasing demand for early PEG tube placement to meet requirements for timely discharge to rehab and skilled nursing facilities.

aimTo assess the safety of early (≤ 7 d post stroke)

methodsWe performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing PEG tube placement for dysphagia following a stroke at two hospitals in Saint Louis, MO between January 2011 and December 2017. Patients were identified by keyword search of endoscopy reports. Mortality, peri-procedural complication rates, and post-procedural complication rates were compared in both groups. Predictors of morbidity and mortality such as protein-calorie malnutrition, presence of an independent cardiovascular risk equivalent, and presence of Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria or documented infection were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression.

results154 patients had a PEG tube placed for dysphagia following a stroke, 92 in the late group and 62 in the early group. There were 32 observed deaths, with 8 occurring within 30 d of the procedure. There was an increase in peri-procedural and post-procedural complications with delayed PEG placement which was not statistically significant. Hospital length of stay was significantly less in patients with early PEG tube placement (12.9

conclusionEarly PEG tube placement following a stroke did not result in a higher rate of mortality or complications and significantly decreased hospital length of stay. Given similar safety outcomes in both groups, early PEG tube placement should be considered in the appropriate patient to potentially reduce length of hospital stay and incurred costs.

Indexed as

DysphagiaEnteral nutritionGastrostomy/adverse effectPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubeStroke

Identifiers

PMID36157266
PMCPMC9453443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.