ArticleJournal of oncology2022
Study on the Application Value of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Clinical Nursing Pathway for Postoperative Patients with Esophageal Cancer.
Article in Journal of oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Innovative technologies and their clinical prospects for early lung cancer screening.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgrounds: To observe the value of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and clinical nursing pathway for postoperative patients with esophageal cancer (EC). Methods: A total of 88 postoperative EC patients were divided into the radiotherapy group (RG group, 44 cases) and the chemoradiotherapy group (CRG group, 44 cases). The RG group received single three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy+clinical nursing pathway, and the CRG group was combined with chemotherapy on this basis. The 5-year overall survival rate, progression-free survival rate, pathological remission and survival rate, lymph node metastasis and survival rate, quality of life analysis, tumor-related factor level, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results: The overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 93.18%, 56.82%, and 50.0% in the CRG group and 86.36%, 52.27%, and 43.18% in the RG group, respectively. The 5-year progression-free survival rate of the CRG group was 60.87%, which was clearly higher than that of the RG group (33.33%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of pCR and NpCR patients were 90.48%, 80.95%, and 61.90% and 89.55%, 44.78%, and 38.81%, respectively. The overall 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 81.08%, 37.84, and 24.32% and 96.08%, 66.67%, and 62.75% in patients with lymph node metastasis and nonlymph node metastasis, respectively, with statistical significant differences. The emotional function, physical function, cough, pain, and eating difficulty in the CRG group were better than those in the RG group. After treatment, serum CEA, SCC, CYFRA21-1, and CA199 levels in the CRG group were obviously downregulated compared with those in the RG group. There was no obvious difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the CRG group and the RG group. Conclusion: Single radiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy can be used as effective means in the treatment of EC. Moreover, the quality of life and survival time of the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group were dramatically better than those of the single radiotherapy group, and the antitumor ability of the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group was stronger.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.