Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157190›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Biochemical, urinary, and acid-base profile in cattle treated with maintenance enteral electrolyte solutions containing calcium propionate, propylene glycol or glycerol.

Pedro Ancelmo Nunes Ermita, Rinaldo Batista Viana, Marcel Ferreira Bastos Avanza, Raffaela Bertoni Cavalcanti Teixeira, José Ricardo Barboza Silva, Lorena Chaves Monteiro, Caio Monteiro Costa, Lucas Drumond Bento, Paulo Vinicius da Costa Mendes, Dayana Alersa Conceição Ferreira Ermita and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pedro Ancelmo Nunes ErmitaInstitute of Humid Tropic Studies, Federal University of South and Southeast of Pará, Xinguara, Brazil.
Rinaldo Batista VianaInstitute of Animal Health and Production, Federal Rural University of the Amazon, Belém, Brazil.
Marcel Ferreira Bastos AvanzaLaboratory of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Viçosa Federal University, Viçosa, Brazil.
Raffaela Bertoni Cavalcanti TeixeiraLaboratory of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Viçosa Federal University, Viçosa, Brazil.
José Ricardo Barboza SilvaLaboratory of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Viçosa Federal University, Viçosa, Brazil.
Lorena Chaves MonteiroLaboratory of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Viçosa Federal University, Viçosa, Brazil.
Caio Monteiro CostaLaboratory of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Viçosa Federal University, Viçosa, Brazil.
Lucas Drumond BentoLaboratory of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Viçosa Federal University, Viçosa, Brazil.
Paulo Vinicius da Costa MendesInstitute of Humid Tropic Studies, Federal University of South and Southeast of Pará, Xinguara, Brazil.
Dayana Alersa Conceição Ferreira ErmitaInstitute of Humid Tropic Studies, Federal University of South and Southeast of Pará, Xinguara, Brazil.
Brenda Ventura Lopes CarvalhoLaboratory of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Viçosa Federal University, Viçosa, Brazil.
Nadyne Souza MoreiraLaboratory of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Viçosa Federal University, Viçosa, Brazil.
Maria Carolina Neves de SouzaLaboratory of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Viçosa Federal University, Viçosa, Brazil.
José Dantas Ribeiro FilhoLaboratory of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Viçosa Federal University, Viçosa, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enteral fluid therapy administered in continuous flow through the naso-ruminal route for long periods with electrolyte solutions is safe and effective in cattle. The aim of this study was to carry out a comparative assessment between maintenance enteral electrolyte solutions containing calcium propionate, propylene glycol or glycerol administered in continuous flow in cattle. Six heifers were used and the study was carried out in a 6 × 3 crossover design, in which each animal received three different treatments: enteral electrolyte solution containing calcium propionate (ESCaP), enteral electrolyte solution containing glycerol (ESGly) and enteral electrolyte solution containing propylene glycol (ESPrG). Solutions were administered at a rate of 15 mL kg

Indexed as

continuous flowenergy sourcesfluid therapylaboratorial analysisnaso-ruminal tube

Identifiers

PMID36157190
PMCPMC9493317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.