Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157123›Full record

ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2022

The Use of Orthostatic Device for 90 Minutes Does Not Change Cardiovascular and Biomechanical Parameters of Patients with Spinal Cord Injury.

Liana Praça Oliveira, Reginaldo Florencio da Silva, Marie Aquino Melo de Leopoldino, Sarah Carvalho Frota, Gabriella Coelho Vieira de Melo Alves, Jefferson Pacheco Amaral Fortes, Pedro Henrique Gomes Muniz, Gisele Harumi Hotta, Francisco Carlos de Mattos Brito Oliveira, Francisco Fleury Uchoa Santos-Júnior

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Liana Praça OliveiraPhysiotherapy Department, Centro Universitário Estácio do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Reginaldo Florencio da SilvaComputation Sciences Department, State University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Marie Aquino Melo de LeopoldinoPhysiotherapy Department, Centro Universitário Estácio do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Sarah Carvalho FrotaPhysiotherapy Department, Centro Universitário Estácio do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Gabriella Coelho Vieira de Melo AlvesPhysiotherapy Department, Centro Universitário Estácio do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Jefferson Pacheco Amaral FortesLe Santé Institute, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Pedro Henrique Gomes MunizComputation Sciences Department, State University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Gisele Harumi HottaUniversity of São Paulo, School of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto, Health Sciences Department, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Francisco Carlos de Mattos Brito OliveiraComputation Sciences Department, State University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Francisco Fleury Uchoa Santos-JúniorLe Santé Institute, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5685-4297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Changes in autonomic function are often caused by spinal cord injuries, which lead to limited orthostatic positioning in these patients. Objective: To investigate the cardiovascular and biomechanical parameters during 90 min of postural elevation equipment usage comparing spinal cord injury and healthy subjects. Methods: A device was used that allowed patients with spinal cord injuries to remain in an orthostatic posture for 90 min. During this period, the physiological parameters were measured every 15 min. Cardiovascular parameters (heart rate, oxygen saturation, blood pressure, and autonomic nervous system) and biomechanical parameters of the plantar pressure distribution were evaluated. For blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and autonomic nervous system, a two-way analysis of variance was applied. The mixed-effect model was applied to plantar pressure. The significance level was set at Results: No differences were observed between the groups in systolic blood pressure ( Conclusion: The present study showed the absence of differences between spinal cord injury patients and control participants using the orthostatic device in terms of cardiovascular and biomechanical parameters over 90 min.

Identifiers

PMID36157123
PMCPMC9507789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.