Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157101›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc2022

Massive Embolism: Knife versus PCI.

Scarlett Tohme, Joshua S Newman, Christopher Gasparis, Frank Manetta

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Role of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Treatment of Massive Pulmonary Embolism.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Scarlett TohmeDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York.
Joshua S NewmanDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-6119-3772
Christopher GasparisDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York.
Frank ManettaDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-8324-5534
Northwell Health · USDonald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism is the third most common cardiovascular syndrome with an estimated up to 25% of patients presenting with sudden death. For those who survive, a mainstay of management for patients with hemodynamic stability is anticoagulation; however, recommendations and options are rapidly changing for patients with submassive or massive pulmonary embolism with hemodynamic instability. Catheter-based and surgical approaches offer efficacious management options for unstable patients or patients with contraindications to anticoagulation; however, both approaches have inherent benefits and risk. This article seeks to offer a brief review on the recommendations and options for management of pulmonary embolism from both surgical and catheter-based perspectives.

Indexed as

catheter-based embolectomycatheter-directed thrombolysisECMOextracorporeal membrane oxygenationpulmonary embolismsurgical pulmonary embolectomy

Identifiers

PMID36157101
PMCPMC9507597
OpenAlexW4292540737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.