Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157099›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc2022

Diagnosis, Diagnostic Tools, and Risk Stratification for Contemporary Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism.

Taylor C Remillard, Arber Kodra, Michael Kim

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic Strategies in Pulmonary Embolism.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taylor C RemillardDepartment of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-1197-3049
Arber KodraDepartment of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York.
Michael KimDepartment of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York.
Northwell Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is quite common and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It is estimated that it is the cause of approximately 100,000 annual deaths in the United States. With great variability in presenting symptoms of PE, poor recognition of PE can be fatal. As such, many risk scores have been created to identify the sickest patients. Choosing the appropriate imaging modality is also critical. Invasive pulmonary angiography was once the gold standard to establish the diagnosis. With the advent of nuclear imaging, V/Q scans, invasive angiography has been phased out for diagnosing acute PE. At present, the standard for diagnosis of acute PE is computed tomography pulmonary angiography. In select patient cohorts, nuclear studies remain the modality of choice. Once the diagnosis of acute PE is established, there is a broad spectrum of severity in outcome which has led to substantial focus and development of risk stratification prediction models. We will discuss making the proper diagnosis with contemporary diagnostic tools and risk stratifying patients with PE to receive the correct treatment.

Indexed as

computed tomography pulmonary angiographyechocardiographypulmonary embolismright ventricular strainrisk stratificationV/Q scan

Identifiers

PMID36157099
PMCPMC9507591
OpenAlexW4293202044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.