ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Application of Genetic Algorithm and U-Net in Brain Tumor Segmentation and Classification: A Deep Learning Approach.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain Tumor Segmentation and Grading on MRI Using Deep Learning: A Systematic Literature Review and Benchmark-Driven Comparative Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hybrid Aquila optimizer-Harris Hawks optimization for CNN hyperparameter tuning in brain tumor classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A novel hybrid framework integrating GA-driven 3D ResUNetGAN for MRI brain tumor segmentation.PloS one · 2026Article
- An Ensemble Model for the Diagnosis of Brain Tumors through MRIs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of unusual cells in the cerebrum causes brain cancer. It is classified primarily into two classes: a noncarcinogenic (benign) type of growth and cancerous (malignant) growth. Early detection of this disease is a quintessential task for all medical practice professionals. For traditional approaches of tumor detections, certain limitations exist. They include less effectiveness, inability to detect due to low-quality processing of images, less dataset for training and testing, less predictive nature to models, and skipping of quintessential stages. All these lead to inaccurate results of tumor detections. To overcome this issue, this paper brings an effective deep learning technique for brain tumor detection with the following stages: (a) data collection from REMBRANDT dataset containing multisequence MRI of 130 patients; (b) preprocessing using conversion to greyscale, skull stripping, and histogram equalization; (c) segmentation uses genetic algorithm; (d) feature extraction using discrete wavelet transform (DWT); (e) particle swarm optimization technique for feature selection; (f) classification using U-Net. Experiment evaluation states that the proposed model (GA-UNET) outperforms (accuracy: 0.97, sensitivity: 0.98, specificity: 0.98) compared to other advanced models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.