Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36156955›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Deformation Analysis and Research of Building Envelope by Deep Learning Technology under the Reinforcement of the Diaphragm Wall.

Lijuan Wang, Qihua Zhao

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lijuan WangState Key Laboratory of GeoHazard Prevention and GeoEnvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Qihua ZhaoState Key Laboratory of GeoHazard Prevention and GeoEnvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4072-4137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The safety analysis of underground buildings is the most crucial problem in the construction industry. This work aims to optimize the safety analysis results of the underground building envelope and comprehensively improve the safety of the underground building. Long short-term memory (LSTM) can make long-term and short-term predictions, thus reducing the model's prediction error. Applying it to the deformation analysis, data prediction of the underground building envelope can improve the accuracy of the deformation prediction of the envelope. This work deeply discusses deep learning technology and the principle of the LSTM model. Based on the safety analysis concept of the underground building envelope, LSTM underground building envelope deformation's prediction model is established and comprehensively evaluated. The results show that in the prediction of horizontal displacement of foundation pit pile of diaphragm wall, the mean relative error (MRE) of the prediction results of the designed model range in 10%-18%, and the calculation time ranges 15-36 s. In the settlement displacement prediction, the model's MRE is within the range of 5%-7%, and the calculation time is within the range of 17-40 s. With the increase of training times, the prediction accuracy of the model increases, and the calculation time becomes relatively stable. Compared with other models, the relative error of prediction results is about 5.4% at the highest and 1.8% at the lowest. This work provides technical support for improving the safety prediction accuracy of the underground building envelope and provides some reference value for the comprehensive development of the underground building industry.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiaphragmTechnology

Identifiers

PMID36156955
PMCPMC9492380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.