Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36156944›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

The Influence of Mutual Assistance of Construction Workers with Different Personality Traits on Team Safety.

Keqing Li, Ting-Kwei Wang, Anyuan Yu, Jieh-Haur Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Keqing LiSchool of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8321-8157
Ting-Kwei WangDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8946-3797
Anyuan YuSchool of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2611-7197
Jieh-Haur ChenDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6063-0464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Construction workers' unsafe behaviors are closely related to construction safety performance. Most existing studies on construction workers' personality traits and safety behaviors have ignored the flexibility of worker mix at construction sites, the dynamics of workers' behaviors, and the complexity of environmental risks at construction sites. Based on the cognitive process of construction workers' safety behaviors and from the perspective of personality traits, this research establishes an agent-based model of steelworkers' mutual assistance behavior. The AnyLogic platform is adopted to show emerging phenomena in complex problems. Through simulation experiments, the optimized configuration of construction team members under different risk environments can be obtained. This research is conducive to project managers to understand the influence of construction workers' mutual assistance on team safety, assess workers' potential for safe work before recruitment, and carry out active safety management from the source instead of looking for the cause of the accident afterward, making safety management theory more realistic and dynamic.

Indexed as

Construction IndustryOccupational HealthHumansPersonalitySafety ManagementSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID36156944
PMCPMC9507708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.