Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36156885›Full record

ArticleAnimal reproduction2022

Sperm quality and morphometry characterization of cryopreserved canine sperm in ACP-106c or TRIS.

Diego Oliveira Teixeira, Herlon Victor Rodrigues Silva, Bruna Farias Brito, Brenna de Sousa Barbosa, Beatriz Evaristo de Almeida Tabosa, Lúcia Daniel Machado da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal reproduction, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diego Oliveira TeixeiraUniversidade Estadual do Ceará, Faculdade de Veterinária, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-4964-7628
Herlon Victor Rodrigues SilvaUniversidade Estadual do Ceará, Faculdade de Veterinária, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-1327-9613
Bruna Farias BritoUniversidade Estadual do Ceará, Faculdade de Veterinária, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5190-024X
Brenna de Sousa BarbosaUniversidade Estadual do Ceará, Faculdade de Veterinária, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-3090-6853
Beatriz Evaristo de Almeida TabosaUniversidade Estadual do Ceará, Faculdade de Veterinária, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-2140-1981
Lúcia Daniel Machado da SilvaUniversidade Estadual do Ceará, Faculdade de Veterinária, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-9793-1968

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphological sperm evaluation supported by the morphometry can be used in the determination of the seminal quality and in the investigation of potential extenders. Although there are studies comparing TRIS and ACP extenders, there are no comparative studies between them for the computerized assisted semen analysis (CASA), sperm viability, membrane functionality and sperm morphometry parameters of cryopreserved canine semen. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the effects of ACP-106c and TRIS on post-freezing canine sperm quality. Five dogs were submitted to semen collection twice with one-week interval. The semen was evaluated within the parameters: total motility, vigor, concentration, viability, plasma membrane functionality, morphology and morphometry. In the morphometric evaluation, the morphologically normal sperm was measured as: length, width, area and perimeter of the head and the midpiece, tail length and total length. The parameters of ellipticity, elongation, regularity and roughness were determined. Then, the semen was divided into two aliquots that were diluted in TRIS or ACP-106c, with the addition of egg yolk and glycerol. The diluted semen was refrigerated and frozen. The thawed samples were evaluated. Total motility, viability, sperm membrane functionality and normal morphology reduced after thawing in both extenders (morphology reduced from 89.60 ± 1.3% to 84.40 ± 1.8 and 84.60 ± 1.1% in TRIS and ACP-106c, respectively). However, it did not differ between TRIS and ACP-106c. In the ACP-106c the sperm head defects in cryopreserved semen were higher compared to fresh semen (P < 0.05). For all the morphometric parameters evaluated, there were no differences between fresh and cryopreserved samples (3.70 ± 0.4%

Indexed as

cryodamagecryopreservationextendersmorphologyspermatozoa measurement

Identifiers

PMID36156885
PMCPMC9484261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.