Association between cerebrovascular reactivity in adult traumatic brain injury and improvement in patient outcome over time: an exploratory analysis.

backgroundImpaired cerebrovascular reactivity following moderate/severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) has emerged as a key potential driver of morbidity and mortality. However, the major contributions to the literature so far have been solely focused on single point measures of long-term outcome. Therefore, it remains unknown whether cerebrovascular reactivity impairment, during the acute phase of TBI, is associated with failure to improve in outcome across time.

methodsCerebrovascular reactivity was measured using three intracranial pressure-based surrogate metrics. For each patient, % time spent above various literature-defined thresholds was calculated. Patients were dichotomized based on outcome transition into Improved vs Not Improved between 1 and 3 months, 3 and 6 months, and 1 and 6 months, based on the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusting for the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) variables.

resultsSeventy-eight patients from the Winnipeg Acute TBI Database were included in this study. On univariate logistic regression analysis, higher % time with cerebrovascular reactivity metrics above clinically defined thresholds was associated with a lack of clinical improvement between 1 and 3 months and 1 and 6 months post injury (p < 0.05). These relationships held true on multivariable logistic regression analysis.

conclusionOur study demonstrates that impaired cerebrovascular reactivity, during the acute phase of TBI, is associated with failure to improve clinically over time. These preliminary findings highlight the significance that cerebrovascular reactivity monitoring carries in outcome recovery association in moderate/severe TBI.