Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36156739›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2022

[Atrial fibrillation on the intensive care unit : The special prognostic importance of the first manifestation].

Andreas Goette, Sybille Brandner

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas GoetteMedizinische Klinik II: Kardiologie und Intensivmedizin, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus Paderborn, Am Busdorf 2, 33098, Paderborn, Deutschland. andreas.goette@vincenz.de.
Sybille Brandner
Brüderkrankenhaus St. Josef Paderborn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the intensive care unit (ICU) and is associated with increased mortality. The AF is classified into five different forms, initially diagnosed AF, paroxysmal AF, persistent AF, long-standing persistent AF and permanent AF. Studies could confirm that the first manifestation of AF (new onset AF) is of particular importance in intensive care patients. The mortality and costs are much higher than for patients with chronic AF. This important clinical difference of the AF pattern should be taken into consideration in the treatment of intensive care patients. The treatment of comorbidities is essential in the treatment concept on the ICU. In patients with an increased risk of thromboembolic complications, therapeutic anticoagulation is indicated, although the greatly increased risk of bleeding during intensive care treatment should be considered in individual cases. In cases of hemodynamic instability electrical cardioversion should immediately be carried out. Otherwise, pharmacological cardioversion can also be carried out. Apart from a few exceptions, amiodarone is the antiarrhythmic drug of choice for rhythm control due to the contraindications for other drugs.

Indexed as

AmiodaroneAtrial FibrillationAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsElectric CountershockHumansIntensive Care UnitsPrognosisAmiodaroneAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsAnticoagulationCardioversionIntensive care medicineRate controlRhythm control

Identifiers

PMID36156739
OpenAlexW4297241026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.