Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36156730›Full record

Observational studyTranslational vision science & technology2022

Clinical Correlation Between Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers and Retinal Sensitivity in Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy.

Maurizio Battaglia Parodi, Lorenzo Bianco, Alessandro Arrigo, Andrea Saladino, Alessio Antropoli, Adelaide Pina, Alessandro Marchese, Emanuela Aragona, Hassan Farah Rashid, Francesco Bandello

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maurizio Battaglia ParodiDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo BiancoDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro ArrigoDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Andrea SaladinoDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alessio AntropoliDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Adelaide PinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro MarcheseDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Emanuela AragonaDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Hassan Farah RashidDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Francesco BandelloDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the clinical and imaging features associated with retinal sensitivity in Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). Methods: This was a cross-sectional, single-center, observational study. Each patient underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT), near-infrared fundus autofluorescence, and OCT angiography. Macular integrity assessment microperimetry under mesopic conditions was performed to obtain retinal sensitivity thresholds from 68 testing points in the central macula. Structural OCT was used to classify BVMD lesions into four types according to their composition: vitelliform, mixed, subretinal fluid, and atrophy. Multilevel, mixed-effects linear regression was used to determine the factors associated with retinal sensitivity. Results: The study included 57 eyes of 30 patients with BVMD, 48 of which (84%) were in a clinical stage. Mean retinal sensitivity varied according to the composition of the lesion: the vitelliform type registering the highest (22 ± 4.1 dB), followed by mixed (18.73 ± 2.7 dB), subretinal fluid (15.68 ± 4.2 dB), and atrophy types (11.85 ± 4.6 dB). The factors most strongly associated with mean retinal sensitivity in BVMD proved to be the OCT lesion type and outer nuclear layer thickness. Conclusions: Retinal sensitivity in BVMD is influenced by lesion composition and outer nuclear layer thickness. Further studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to examine retinal sensitivity over time and to validate retinal sensitivity changes as biomarkers for BVMD. Translational Relevance: Assessing retinal sensitivity in BVMD provides a new instrument in the clinical characterization of the disease and offers the opportunity to identify imaging biomarkers for use as outcome measures in future clinical trials.

Indexed as

Vitelliform Macular DystrophyAtrophyBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesFluorescein AngiographyHumansRetinal Pigment EpitheliumTomography, Optical CoherenceBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID36156730
PMCPMC9526372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.