Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36156357›Full record

ArticleAnnals of diagnostic pathology2022

The presence of retraction clefts correlates with lymphovascular invasion and lymph node metastasis and predicts poor outcome: Analysis of 2497 breast cancer patients.

Weidong Li, Hongqin Jia, Shuling Wang, Xiaojing Guo, Xinmin Zhang, Lanjing Zhang, Hannah Y Wen, Li Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of diagnostic pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Weidong LiDepartment of Breast Cancer Pathology and Research Laboratory, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
Hongqin JiaDepartment of Breast Cancer Pathology and Research Laboratory, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Department of Pathology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
Shuling WangDepartment of Breast Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
Xiaojing GuoDepartment of Breast Cancer Pathology and Research Laboratory, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
Xinmin ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Cooper University Hospital, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, One Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ, USA.
Lanjing ZhangDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center of Princeton, Plainsboro, NJ, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Hannah Y WenDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: weny@mskcc.org.
Li FuDepartment of Breast Cancer Pathology and Research Laboratory, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China. Electronic address: fuli@tmu.edu.cn.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some invasive breast carcinomas are surrounded by a clear space that separate the tumor cells from the adjacent stroma, similar to invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC), but lack the thin strands of connective tissue that separate the cells and characteristic "inside-out" growth pattern of IMPC on immunohistochemical stain for EMA. We consider the presence of the retraction clefts a common phenomenon that may present as a precursor stage of IMPC (PSIMPC). In this study, a total of 2497 cases of invasive breast carcinomas were prospectively collected. Among 2497 cases of breast cancer, 949 (38.0 %) cases were PSIMPC, 200 (8.0 %) cases were IMPC and 1348 (54.0 %) cases were IBC-NST. LVI was seen in128 of 200 (64 %) IMPC and 364 of 948 (38.0 %) PSIMPC, in contrast to 246 of 1341 (18 %) IBC-NST (P < 0.001). Lymph node metastasis was seen in 147 of 200 (73.4 %) IMPC and 551 of 949 (58 %) PSIMPC, in contrast to 563 of 1345 (42 %) IBC-NST (P < 0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of PSIMPC were 76.8 % and 87.6 %, compared to 63.2 % and 85.9 % in IMPC, 86.2 % and 93.7 % in IBC-NST. PSIMPC demonstrated a more favorable DFS and OS compared to IMPC, but worse DFS and OS compared to IBC-NST. Cox and logistic regression analysis showed that PSIMPC was an independent predictor of DFS and OS. Our findings suggest that the presence of retraction clefts is a precursor state of IMPC, exhibiting IMPC-like features, such as higher incidence of lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis and more aggressive clinical behavior.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinomaCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, PapillaryDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisBreast cancerInvasive micropapillary carcinomaLymph node metastasisLymphovascular invasionRetraction clefts

Identifiers

PMID36156357
PMCPMC10083074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.