ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2022
A longitudinal study of Candida bloodstream infections in a Japanese university hospital: species distribution, drug susceptibility, clinical features, and mortality predictors.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practice guideline on the prevention and treatment of central line-associated bloodstream infection: Part 2 - Treatment.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Two-step deep-learning candidemia prediction model using two large time-sequence electronic health datasets.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Epidemiology and Clinical Features ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Candidemia a 8-Year Retrospective Study from a Teaching Hospital in China.Infection and drug resistance · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to detect possible changes in Candida species distribution over time and to know the antifungal susceptibility profile of isolates obtained from patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) due to this pathogen. Risk factors associated with 30-day mortality were also assessed. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with Candida BSI at a Japanese university hospital from 2013 to 2021. The change in the distribution pattern of the Candida spp. isolated was examined by considering three successive sub-periods of 3 years each. Risk factors for 30-day mortality were determined using Cox regression analysis. In the entire study period, Candida albicans was the most frequent species (46.7%), followed by Candida glabrata (21.5%) and Candida parapsilosis (18.7%). There was no change in Candida species distribution comparing the three sub-periods analyzed. All isolates were susceptible to micafungin, and most were susceptible to fluconazole, except for C. glabrata. No isolates were resistant to amphotericin B or voriconazole. The overall 30-day mortality was 40.2%. Univariate analysis revealed an association between 30-day mortality and central venous catheter (CVC) removal at any time, high Pitt bacteremia score (PBS), and high Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Multivariate Cox analysis found that high PBS was the only independent predictor of 30-day mortality; subsequent multivariate Cox regression demonstrated that early CVC removal significantly reduced 30-day mortality. Candida species distribution and antifungal susceptibility profile in our hospital remained similar from 2013 to 2021. Early CVC removal may improve candidemia outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36156177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.