SynthesisLa Tunisie medicale
Update meta-analysis from biomedical literature about MTHFR'polymorphisms and the CML' risk.
Synthesis in La Tunisie medicale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- How to assess heterogeneity for a meta-analysis?La Tunisie medicaleArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe MTHFR gene polymorphisms are closely related to the chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Case-control studies have associated the MTHFR polymorphisms and susceptibility to CML but the results were not conclusive.
aimTo assess this association through an update meta-analysis.
methodsA descriptive and qualitative study was conducted among students in the 6th year of the faculty during the academic year 2020/2021. The data were collected through a questionnaire written in french evaluating the teaching methods. A focus group of ten persons was led to understand better student's opinions.
resultsTotally, 17 and 12 case-control studies including CML cases and controls were enrolled in the meta-analysis respectively for C677T and A1298C polymorphism and CML risk. A poor association between the C677T (T vs C ; OR= 1,28; IC95%= [1,01;1,63]; p=0,04) and the one not significant between the A1298C (C vs A ; OR= 1,52; IC95%= [0,92; 2,51]; p= 0,1) polymorphisms and the CML risk for overall population were found.
conclusionThe results of this meta-analysis suggested no significant association between C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and CML risk leading to consider other factors such us folic acid intake, gene-gene and gene- environment interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36155899PMC9476263W4297258647What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.